Darwin + Elements Design review of new components

[foxintherain]

What

Following our technical conversation on how we can best prepare for Project Darwin, we said that we would look at the new designs and annotate them to agree on scope, definitions and clarify terminology for components.

Why

We want to understand:

• What existing components do we have already • What changes might we need to make to elements to support new designs • What changes might we want to make to the new design to make the best use of elements • Accessibility considerations

Done when

• [x] We have deconstructed new components and / or new configurations to existing components
• [x] We have agreed on any changes to elements to support the new designs
• [x] We have reviewed the any new changes or components with the accessibility team

Anything else

Rolling docs for Oscar + Elements teams: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13Fzfk0nUygJCmG5bcQPI2kSw95i5tIjDoySUGtxcszM/edit

Design review: https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVPvH2H9M=/

Component definition https://docs.google.com/document/d/1K6TIKK05XpWUN8u-UMwUevg6zoUDg147ZkuZyizLZIo/edit#heading=h.z0syvbcrqr89

[foxintherain]

Next steps:

Taking examples from the darwin design proposals, we will deconstruct the designs in order to understand how to modify or create new components that can work at scale.

• List different types of cards
• Define taxonomy of cards, e.g. “product card”, “person card
• Review with @Sreilys @Heydon and @sturobson