Multiversion concurrency control(MVCC) should be implemented for transaction isolation

sprokopenko / cqengine

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/cqengine

0 stars 0 forks source link

Multiversion concurrency control(MVCC) should be implemented for transaction isolation #36

Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Multiversion concurrency control(MVCC) should be implemented for transaction 
isolation handling.

Lock is not an efficient solution if performance and consistency is important.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by harry.ca...@gmail.com on 27 Apr 2014 at 10:15

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Implementing MVCC is on my radar. In the meantime, patches are welcome.

Changing type from defect -> enhancement as this is not a bug.

Original comment by ni...@npgall.com on 25 Nov 2014 at 10:37

Changed state: Accepted
Added labels: Type-Enhancement
Removed labels: Type-Defect

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Implemented in CQEngine 2.0.

Original comment by ni...@npgall.com on 20 Apr 2015 at 8:25

Changed state: Done