Open oldergod opened 1 month ago
Yes, all types listed are from .proto
files within https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/tree/main/src/google/protobuf
Yes, all types listed are from
.proto
files within https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/tree/main/src/google/protobuf
Nice! Do you have timeline for FieldMask support at least?
Not at all. They should all already be working but you'll run into troubles if you have a codebase using Wire and protoc alongside each other. Those types will be generated by both and conflict.
I see. We are internally using Wire-Runtime to parse protobuf file, but there is no ProtoType.FieldMask yet.
hey @oldergod ,
The field mask you in this issue is the google.protobuf.fieldmask? https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/blob/main/src/google/protobuf/field_mask.proto