This makes the detection harder and perhaps requires the cartesian product of inverters and dongles?
Issue #80 prompted me to split out the method of access into a base class, but I would expect that the data received from different registers will need a different mapping onto sensor descriptions. One could hope that this will be the same mapping from indexes to meanings for the same model inverter meaning that part can live as a mixin and then the concrete types can just inherit from both InverterPostData and that?
I'm afraid I don't have the time right now to contribute but if tagged in a PR I am happy to run a test against my inverter (X1 Hybrid G4 with new wifi dongle - it returns gives version 3.003.02)
Various issues/comments suggest that new pocket wifi dongles have to be accessed via a POST with the request in the data rather than URL.
75 (now resolved by #77 - thanks Robin! @squishykid)
80
This makes the detection harder and perhaps requires the cartesian product of inverters and dongles?
Issue #80 prompted me to split out the method of access into a base class, but I would expect that the data received from different registers will need a different mapping onto sensor descriptions. One could hope that this will be the same mapping from indexes to meanings for the same model inverter meaning that part can live as a mixin and then the concrete types can just inherit from both
InverterPostData
and that?I'm afraid I don't have the time right now to contribute but if tagged in a PR I am happy to run a test against my inverter (X1 Hybrid G4 with new wifi dongle - it returns gives version 3.003.02)