Closed yaaminiv closed 4 months ago
Just to confirm we have already removed CT SNPS from methylation data in the paper... https://rpubs.com/sr320/1037429
Remind me why we need to revise the list?
Just to confirm we have already removed CT SNPS from methylation data in the paper... https://rpubs.com/sr320/1037429
Correct! These were SNPs from BS-Snper.
Remind me why we need to revise the list?
Based on conversations with Katherine during the workshop, the EpiDiverse/SNP workflow may be a more robust way of identifying SNPs from WGBS data. Additionally, we have RNA-Seq data we can also use to identify SNPs. We discussed comparing SNP identification between BS-Snper and EpiDiverse since we had the data, then maybe only removing SNPs identified using both methods unless there was a compelling reason to use one workflow over the other. So if we do revise the list of SNPs, we'll need to remove them again from the analyses.
At minimum, identifying C->T SNPs on both strands so we have a list of SNPs from the EpiDiverse output.
Other tasks that build upon that: