Hi @sr320
I checked over with @mdelrio1 and i was missing some data, because i thought, if we have 22974 sequences and after we obtained with the aspect P (SQL), we obtained 19483, so to prevent take duplicates, I took only the data to correspond to P (16451, but they did not have function or aspect in F or C), which correspond inside of 19483 but no correspond for all the data with the aspect P. It was my mistake.
Hi @sr320 I checked over with @mdelrio1 and i was missing some data, because i thought, if we have 22974 sequences and after we obtained with the aspect P (SQL), we obtained 19483, so to prevent take duplicates, I took only the data to correspond to P (16451, but they did not have function or aspect in F or C), which correspond inside of 19483 but no correspond for all the data with the aspect P. It was my mistake.