Closed se7entyse7en closed 5 years ago
Looks like the code generated by you and by travis is different. Maybe there is a problem with the versions used.
@carlosms you're right, the version was wrong. Thanks!
@carlosms I don't completely understand what is the case that would cause problems. AFAIU the problem arises if now we remove it and then let's say next week we add another field with the same name and number, but for example a different type. But that could be a problem if that object is interpreted using the old version of the proto file right?
imo we are still at the very early stage of lookout and pollute it with reserved doesn't make much sense to me.
:man_shrugging: ok let's skip the reserved
First task from issue: https://github.com/src-d/lookout/issues/83.