Closed glimow closed 5 years ago
I used a simple keras MLP with two hidden layers of 100 neurons and a mean squared error loss.
_________________________________________________________________ Layer (type) Output Shape Param # ================================================================= dense_1 (Dense) (None, 100) 30100 _________________________________________________________________ activation_1 (Activation) (None, 100) 0 _________________________________________________________________ dense_2 (Dense) (None, 100) 10100 _________________________________________________________________ activation_2 (Activation) (None, 100) 0 _________________________________________________________________ dense_3 (Dense) (None, 1) 101 ================================================================= Total params: 40,301 Trainable params: 40,301 Non-trainable params: 0 _________________________________________________________________
The neural network quickly converges and gives an estimator that is ~3 times better than taking the mean size of docker images. This is using a subset of 5% of the final dataset.
Tristan's internship has ended. The artifact is https://github.com/src-d/docker-image-analysis which is going to become public.
I used a simple keras MLP with two hidden layers of 100 neurons and a mean squared error loss.
The neural network quickly converges and gives an estimator that is ~3 times better than taking the mean size of docker images. This is using a subset of 5% of the final dataset.