Closed irinakhismatullina closed 5 years ago
@EgorBu PTAL, analyzer tests now seem to have everything to pass.
@irinakhismatullina What's up with this PR?
@vmarkovtsev I will use it for fixing analyzer tests, hope to do it today.
@irinakhismatullina Any update here?
Waiting for @EgorBu to take a look, i checked what i could, can't understand what's the problem without running the analyzer myself.
Now it's ready
LGTM in general. A couple of minors improvements possible
@vmarkovtsev @EgorBu Somehow while using keyword arguments in analyzer.analyze()
this strange error arises https://travis-ci.com/src-d/style-analyzer/jobs/187395746#L3334. Without keywords here everything's fine.
Probably this is a wrong behavior and indicates some bugs in other places?
@irinakhismatullina wrapped_handle_rpc_errors
has been recently added by @zurk
Konst should quickly find the reason.
let me see
A decorator is not mine, I think @vmarkovtsev is the original author. It is just not created to be used with named arguments. I can address it, but let's merge this code as is to not wait.
Indeed, I confused it with bytes to unicode decorators, sorry.
OK, now I start to remember. LEt me figure this out myself later today.
Sorry, @vmarkovtsev, too late :) https://github.com/src-d/lookout-sdk-ml/pull/81
@EgorBu +1?
@vmarkovtsev It's still a problem https://travis-ci.com/src-d/style-analyzer/jobs/187821986#L3349
LGTM
@irinakhismatullina Of course it is, I just want Egor's formal approval here.
@irinakhismatullina Can you please rebase
Related to #686.