What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. I used the VIPER data. Cases per reader and readers per case look right.
---
What is the expected output?
I expected to see a lot more observations
---
What do you see instead?
Few observations
---
What is the recommended fix?
I think the figure might expect the caseIDs to run 1,2,3,...
The caseIDs in the VIPER data are not sequential and do not start from 1.
5 digits!
---
I hope I can get to it!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by Brandon.Gallas on 17 Feb 2015 at 5:54
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
Brandon.Gallas
on 17 Feb 2015 at 5:54