Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Hi, is this something you have been looking into yet or planned?
I am quite interested in this feature...
Original comment by gosub....@gmail.com
on 6 May 2009 at 5:24
It's actually more of a reminder than anything else. I don't have yet decided
what to implement concretely. Right
now you *can* access different cores from SolrNet, just configure the url as
e.g. http://localhost:8983/solr/core0
instead of http://localhost:8983/solr.
If you have any doubts or want to discuss this further, post this to the google
group
(http://groups.google.com/group/solrnet).
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2009 at 7:00
ok, thanks for the quick response. Without having looked at it yet, this
doesn't
really mean i could search multiple cores with one single query, does it?
Original comment by gosub....@gmail.com
on 6 May 2009 at 8:19
No, that's covered by sharding (see issue #11)
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 6 May 2009 at 9:06
Is it possible to configure two facilities to multiple cores?
How to diff the core that the query is using?
Thanks
Original comment by earthh...@gmail.com
on 13 Aug 2009 at 3:41
Please use the google group for support questions. The issue tracker is only
for issue
solving related discussions.
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 13 Aug 2009 at 5:00
OK. thanks
Original comment by earthh...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2009 at 7:41
Renamed the issue title so it's more clear. This aims to implement multicore
commands
like STATUS, CREATE, RELOAD, etc as explained on the Solr wiki.
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 18 Nov 2009 at 4:58
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 30 May 2010 at 12:22
Started here: http://github.com/mausch/SolrNet/tree/SolrCoreAdmin. Only thing
missing is parsing the response.
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 19 Aug 2010 at 11:28
Done in
https://github.com/mausch/SolrNet/commit/2e45e1361e3fd3db3a22209b5b38514bbc6dadc
d , thanks to Andre' Hazelwood and Howard Van Rooijen.
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 7 Mar 2012 at 2:53
Original comment by mauricio...@gmail.com
on 8 Sep 2013 at 5:08
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mauricio...@gmail.com
on 18 Sep 2008 at 2:18