srinidhiPY / SSL_CR_Histo

Official code for "Self-Supervised driven Consistency Training for Annotation Efficient Histopathology Image Analysis" Published in Medical Image Analysis (MedIA) Journal, Oct, 2021.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102256
MIT License
62 stars 21 forks source link

BreastPathQ: After trianing the model by WSIs, the result which evaluated by Task-specific supervised fine-tuning is bad #7

Closed xiaozhu0816 closed 1 year ago

xiaozhu0816 commented 2 years ago
srinidhiPY commented 1 year ago

I am really sorry for the late reply.

In our experiments for BreastPathQ, we have used 69 WSI’s of the training set for pretraining the self-supervised model. I think the issue in your case may be because of 4 WSIs, which were not used.

As the number of patches that can be extracted from a given WSI mainly depends on the tissue content, there might be a high probability that you have lost some significant amount of data for SSL training.

On Sun, 25 Sept 2022 at 10:34, xiaozhu0816 @.***> wrote:

-

For BreastPathQ, when I used the pretrian model author released and did the finetune, I could get a similar result to your paper.

But I tried to pretrain the model myself, following the instructions (1. Self-supervised pretext task: Resolution sequence prediction (RSP) in WSIs). I used the best pretrain model and did the same things as before. After finetuning, the result was not good enough like paper.

paper:[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72501744/192129127-48496486-edf8-4a6e-a180-975e4aea5e1e.png

my reslut: [image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/72501744/192129132-9028df2d-758f-42dd-855a-180e17b24c02.png

During my training, 4 WSIs which are bad wsis cannot be used. But I don’t think it is an essential problem for me, because just lose hundreds of data.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/srinidhiPY/SSL_CR_Histo/issues/7, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD4AXU3CCSL4736WLTUZFVLV77MMZANCNFSM6AAAAAAQU5YVKI . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>