Closed christophsax closed 5 years ago
Merging #21 into master will decrease coverage by
3.02%
. The diff coverage is0%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 34.4% 31.38% -3.03%
==========================================
Files 7 7
Lines 1558 1708 +150
==========================================
Hits 536 536
- Misses 1022 1172 +150
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
R/SA_Programs.R | 0% <0%> (ø) |
:arrow_up: |
src/BDFM.cpp | 54.42% <0%> (-0.89%) |
:arrow_down: |
R/utils.R | 1.56% <0%> (-3.71%) |
:arrow_down: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2f6cd20...736c98e. Read the comment docs.
Agreed: this looks like a weak reason to keep such a big dependency.
It is fine to delete merged branches: They are still kept somewhere on GitHub, and can be undeleted:
That makes it easier to keep an overview of the active branches.
I guess data.table must be properly imported.
At the same time, on Line 556, the object to overwrite was
nn
, rather thanN
, so perhaps your error was just that.Anyway, I still will try to refactor the thing, perhaps we can do it efficiently without depending on data.table. But for the moment, let's keep it that way.