Thoughts? This would introduce use of ref for both works and manuscripts but we could control by @type
<div xml:id="refsToMSS">
<head>References to other manuscripts</head>
<p>References in the description to other manuscripts should be enclosed in
<gi>bibl</gi> tags with <att>type</att> of value <val>MS</val>. The
<att>subtype</att> may be used to indicate if the manuscript is held
by the same institution that holds the manuscript being catalogued
(value <val>interal</val>) or by another institution (value
<val>external)</val>. In the former case, the shelfmark should not
include the location or institution name; in the latter case, location
and institution should be included.</p>
<p> The <gi>ref</gi> element may be used to provide a link to an online
catalogue or digital fascimile. <egXML
xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/Examples"> Eberbach, Cistercian abbey
(?): ‘modern’ chapter numbers added in boxes in the margin, as in
<bibl type="MS" subtype="internal">MS. Laud Lat. 107</bibl>. </egXML>
<egXML xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/Examples"> This scribe was also
responsible for most of the Simeon manuscript (<bibl type="MS"
subtype="external"><ref
target="http://www.bl.uk/manuscripts/FullDisplay.aspx?ref=Add_MS_22283"
>London, British Library, Add. MS. 22283</ref></bibl>) but
has not yet been identified in any other manuscripts or documents.
</egXML>
</p>
</div>
Thoughts? This would introduce use of ref for both works and manuscripts but we could control by @type