Add. 17,217, foll. 1–19 | https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/930 list of planned changes is incorrect + changes I can't make

[SPuchkova]

Here is a similar problem with this ms description in XML. The list of planned changes is incorrect. These issues are not applicable to this MS:

[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: Add missing Arabic text.

  <change type="planned" subtype="vocalization" who="https://bl.syriac.uk/documentation/editors.xml#smbl-general-editors">[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: Enter vocalization.</change>
  <change type="planned" subtype="arithmetical" who="https://bl.syriac.uk/documentation/editors.xml#smbl-general-editors">[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: Enter arithmetical figures.</change>

[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: Add in missing Coptic characters.

Also, there are changes that I am not able to make in this MS: change type="planned" subtype="question" who="https://bl.syriac.uk/documentation/editors.xml#smbl-general-editors">[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: Question in Word Doc to be Addressed.

[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: Table to be revised. [https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/929]: One or more msParts need to be encoded into an historical reconstruction of a no longer extant manuscript..

  <change type="planned" subtype="syriac" who="https://bl.syriac.uk/documentation/editors.xml#smbl-general-editors">[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/933]: Add in missing Syriac characters for Jacob of Edessa's voweling, as well as others mentioned in Wright's description. See line 862.</change>
  <change type="planned" subtype="consultation" who="https://bl.syriac.uk/documentation/editors.xml#smbl-general-editors">[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/1499]: Wright does not provide a description of the lower text; further consultation needed.</change>
  <change type="planned" subtype="consultation" who="https://bl.syriac.uk/documentation/editors.xml#smbl-general-editors">[https://bl.syriac.uk/ms/933]: Wright gives no indication whether this msItem is the upper or lower text of the folios; consultation of the manuscript required.</change>

[wlpotter]

Thanks @SPuchkova we will take a look at these