Closed wlpotter closed 1 year ago
Initial testing has revealed the following missing bits:
<el xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<uri>https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/228</uri>
<textNoteMissing>true</textNoteMissing>
<translationNoteMissing>false</translationNoteMissing>
</el>
<el xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<uri>https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/214</uri>
<textNoteMissing>true</textNoteMissing>
<translationNoteMissing>false</translationNoteMissing>
</el>
<el xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<uri>https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/259</uri>
<textNoteMissing>true</textNoteMissing>
<translationNoteMissing>false</translationNoteMissing>
</el>
<el xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<uri>https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/129</uri>
<textNoteMissing>true</textNoteMissing>
<translationNoteMissing>false</translationNoteMissing>
</el>
<el xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<uri>https://caesarea-maritima.org/testimonia/257</uri>
<textNoteMissing>true</textNoteMissing>
<translationNoteMissing>false</translationNoteMissing>
</el>
@type
attribute.So the verdict is, I think, to check the data template. Otherwise these were added using the cmd+e
rather than the dedicated fields? Not sure yet...
The files coming in from Box on 2022-10-19 (cf. #160 for an example) may have had their textual and translation notes deleted. I'm not sure but I want to double check.
I think the best way will be to take the dump from Box, find non-empty textual or translation notes, and then see if the current version on production is missing those notes. This should tell us if this is an isolated problem or if we need to address a processing issue. Stay tuned.