Open davidamichelson opened 10 years ago
Because Wright is reproducing the text as it appears on the manuscript, we do call it a quote and not just a paragraph that happens to be in Syriac. His English paraphrase, on the other hand, will be just a paragraph, and not a quote. See below.
In the msItem:
In the additions:
According to a note at the foot of fol. 48b, the
manuscript once belonged to a
Tucker, do we have an example of this anywhere? See for comparison MS Add. 14,634, foll. 3-49 2#514-515.
Thanks!