Closed wsalesky closed 6 years ago
@wsalesky foaf:group should work fine: http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_Group. Do you have an idea of how to implement it? I'd have to think about that. (I'm in my LOD course right now, discussing databases actually.)
I was thinking of using rdf:type. An example:
http://syriaca.org/spear/119-13 rdf:type foaf:group
in addition to
http://syriaca.org/spear/119-13 rdf:type syriaca:personFactoid
In that context, would it be best to use syriaca:personGrpFactoid? Am I right that what you write above would basically assert that the factoid is a group then what we want to assert is that it is a factoid that contains data about a personGrp?
Hum, yes, that might be right. And/Or perhaps we need to add the foaf:group to the actual person factoid instead?
http://syriaca.org/person/2210 foaf:name 'Workers in the government of Edessa in November A. D. 201 Teshri II A. Gr. 513'
http://syriaca.org/person/2210 rdf:type foaf:group
I think that would be a good approach. Would we then want to add this where relevant
http://syriaca.org/person/# rdf:type foaf:person
currently they have lawd:Person should we change it?
Oh that's right. No, if we have lawd:Person we should keep that.
okay, so I will just add the rdf:type foaf:group
Now I just have to figure out how to query that correctly.
@dlschwartz We need a way to encode personGrp to distinguish them from person factoids in SPEAR RDF. Any thoughts?