A number of person records contain a tei:note inside tei:bibl. I propose we remove all of these. We do not allow this in the Gazetteer. I think the mindset in persons was more discursive footnotes and the mindset in places was more citations. I think we want to regularize practice across datasets. I find 62 cases of this in SBD (roughly 2/3 in saints, 1/3 in authors).
Many are just snippets of text without much purpose.
In some cases there is useful information but it is not necessarily appropriate to a bibliographic entry.
person/1086: We note a mistake in Wright. This is relevant to the entry but not necessarily a citation. Moreover, as written, we can't serialize this data into RDF.
A number of person records contain a tei:note inside tei:bibl. I propose we remove all of these. We do not allow this in the Gazetteer. I think the mindset in persons was more discursive footnotes and the mindset in places was more citations. I think we want to regularize practice across datasets. I find 62 cases of this in SBD (roughly 2/3 in saints, 1/3 in authors).
Many are just snippets of text without much purpose.
In some cases there is useful information but it is not necessarily appropriate to a bibliographic entry.