tei:note

[dlschwartz]

We currently have the following @type attributes on tei:note:

• abstract
  • 1959/2827 records have an abstract.
  • But every record should have an abstract (as in Gazetteer)
• author
  • 1 record person/2805, described as a translator, not an author
• disambiguation (25x, see #1030 )
• misc (13x, contains old spreadsheet notes that got converted to TEI)
  • These are "notes to self". Questions should be resolved and notes deleted.
• record-description (7x)
  • These should be encoded as type="description"
  • They need to link to tei:bibl elements as each one cites a source in the prose of the note.
• description (106x) -- no changes needed
• deprecation (17x, used to indicate the deprecation of a name) -- no changes needed
• incerta (11x) -- no changes needed

[davidamichelson]

Gazetteer allows:

note/@type

All element must have an @type value. The current list of allowed values for note/@type are:

"corrigenda"
"deprecation"
"disambiguation"
"errata"
"incerta"
"license"

The Srophé application displays the note/@type value as a label on the note in most cases. For example, note/@type="deprecation" will be labelled as "Deprecation" in the HTML view. In the case of note/@type="license" in the , the @type label is not displayed.

[davidamichelson]

For both places and persons we should create and allow @type="discursive", for example this could be used for person/13 The bibliography on Ephrem is immense, thus only works cited in this entry are included in the list below.

[dlschwartz]

Update syriacaAll.odd to allow only the following values for @type on tei:note

"corrigenda"
"deprecation"
"disambiguation"
"discursive"
"errata"
"incerta"
"license"

[dlschwartz]

We have ca. 100 instances of <note xml:lang="en" type="description">In hagiography...</note>.

Should we keep this @type attribute? Change it to something else? None of the above seem appropriate.

[davidamichelson]

Sorry, just to clarify, persons needs to have abstract and description as types of note, because it can’t take a desc like places has. I think we discussed this, but may be it slipped by.

On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 4:06 PM Daniel Schwartz @.***> wrote:

We have ca. 100 instances of In hagiography....

Should we keep this @type https://github.com/type attribute? Change it to something else? None of the above seem appropriate.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/srophe/srophe-app-data/issues/1038#issuecomment-1583342925, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAXQ37I7UMHHT3J3TO2MKCLXKI5E3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAY3FRYAU . You are receiving this because you were assigned.Message ID: @.***>