Open nathangibson opened 7 years ago
@jedwardwalters @davidamichelson @dlschwartz @tacarlson
Right now I'm linking NHSL records to corpus texts using the following format, with a bibl for the entire corpus and a citedRange for the specific text:
<bibl xml:id="bib77-75" type="lawd:Edition"> <title level="m">The Oxford-BYU Syriac Corpus</title> <ptr target="http://syriaca.org/bibl/2331"/> <citedRange unit="entry" target="http://wwwb.library.vanderbilt.edu/exist/apps/syriac-corpus/rec.html?id=https://syriaccorpus.org/123">Romans (Peshitta Version) - <foreign xml:lang="syr">ܐܓܪܬܐ ܕܦܘܠܘܣ ܕܠܘܬ ܪ̈ܗܘܡܝܐ</foreign></citedRange> <listRelation> <relation active="#bib77-75" ref="dct:source" passive="#bib77-76"/> </listRelation> </bibl>
It seems to me as if each of the corpus texts is a digital edition and should therefore have its own bibl URI associated directly with the corpus URI.
I'll add to our editors' docket.
Yes, @dlschwartz says we should!
Okay, great. Should we add it as a column to our spreadsheet? https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1d8gxz-Ax7bozQeAzy7ufzSjUn0z9muNHIi910A0gcuw/edit#gid=0
@jedwardwalters @davidamichelson @dlschwartz @tacarlson
Right now I'm linking NHSL records to corpus texts using the following format, with a bibl for the entire corpus and a citedRange for the specific text:
It seems to me as if each of the corpus texts is a digital edition and should therefore have its own bibl URI associated directly with the corpus URI.
I'll add to our editors' docket.