switching to github actions

StarrFox commented 1 year ago

is there any reason to use appveyor?

github actions is a lot easier to use (and doesn't break every time you edit it) and the setup python action has 32 bit support

https://github.com/actions/setup-python?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-architectures

srounet commented 1 year ago

At the time of appVeyor, github actions wasn't an option. As I do not want to drop automatic testing, I'm open to switching to github actions, it seems les fuzzy and more reliable.

Only issue i see, is taking the time to implement it (as long as it is free of any charges).

StarrFox commented 1 year ago

I'll start working on adding this

StarrFox commented 1 year ago

for publishing I think using https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish with trusted publishing https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/ would be pretty good

StarrFox commented 11 months ago

started working on this

https://github.com/srounet/Pymem/actions/runs/7373730374/job/20063310339 we have some test failures due to existing issues with injection it seems but other than that it looks good

srounet commented 11 months ago

This is pretty cool, thank you for taking the time to switching to github actions, I'm sure it will benefits to the communauty. ❤️

Le lun. 1 janv. 2024, 02:01, StarrFox @.***> a écrit :

started working on this

https://github.com/srounet/Pymem/actions/runs/7373730374/job/20063310339 we have some test failures due to existing issues with injection it seems but other than that it looks good

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/srounet/Pymem/issues/119#issuecomment-1873079964, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABPQKSIEFNJGXSZEZ2PNALYMIDGVAVCNFSM6AAAAAA73IW2CWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNZTGA3TSOJWGQ . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

srounet / Pymem

switching to github actions #119