switching to github actions

StarrFox commented 7 months ago

is there any reason to use appveyor?

github actions is a lot easier to use (and doesn't break every time you edit it) and the setup python action has 32 bit support

https://github.com/actions/setup-python?tab=readme-ov-file#supported-architectures

srounet commented 7 months ago

At the time of appVeyor, github actions wasn't an option. As I do not want to drop automatic testing, I'm open to switching to github actions, it seems les fuzzy and more reliable.

Only issue i see, is taking the time to implement it (as long as it is free of any charges).

StarrFox commented 7 months ago

I'll start working on adding this

StarrFox commented 7 months ago

for publishing I think using https://github.com/marketplace/actions/pypi-publish with trusted publishing https://docs.pypi.org/trusted-publishers/ would be pretty good

StarrFox commented 6 months ago

started working on this

https://github.com/srounet/Pymem/actions/runs/7373730374/job/20063310339 we have some test failures due to existing issues with injection it seems but other than that it looks good

srounet commented 6 months ago

This is pretty cool, thank you for taking the time to switching to github actions, I'm sure it will benefits to the communauty. ❤️

Le lun. 1 janv. 2024, 02:01, StarrFox @.***> a écrit :

started working on this

https://github.com/srounet/Pymem/actions/runs/7373730374/job/20063310339 we have some test failures due to existing issues with injection it seems but other than that it looks good

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/srounet/Pymem/issues/119#issuecomment-1873079964, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AABPQKSIEFNJGXSZEZ2PNALYMIDGVAVCNFSM6AAAAAA73IW2CWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQNZTGA3TSOJWGQ . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>

srounet / Pymem

switching to github actions #119