fmetze
commented
6 years ago maybe a mis-match in data preparation? or some parameters are off? impossible to say without a detailed analysis of what is going wrong (insertion, deletions, types of errors, …) you should be able to achieve a better performance on the training set than on the test set, generally.
On Oct 6, 2017, at 2:29 AM, harikrishnavydana notifications@github.com wrote:
hiii, In a normal eesen setup, while i decode the train set i run to very bad wer?any comments on such behaviour? any possible mistakes in the setup, but the WER on eval setup is good
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/srvk/eesen/issues/152, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEnA8bhXqSZV_4BdZmTvOab-Fxd0B1Yyks5spcjQgaJpZM4PwDgs.
Florian Metze http://www.cs.cmu.edu/directory/florian-metze Associate Research Professor Carnegie Mellon University
hiii, In a normal eesen setup, while i decode the train set i run to very bad wer?any comments on such behaviour? any possible mistakes in the setup, but the WER on eval setup is good