Closed mmckegg closed 7 years ago
happy if we doubled the index to have both timestamp orderings available, also happy if you prefer only the asserted order timestamp.
i'm okay with channels sorted by asserted timestamp. but i'm using ssb-backlinks for listing mentions also, and those i would want in received order. so i would suggest index by both
I think I'm just going to be adding another index!
Added the additional index in 92fbdafe376f4faa01b901b89e29eeb6927ade99
I have realised that I actually need this index to be in asserted order timestamps (
msg.value.timestamp
) rather than receive order (msg.timestamp
) for the channel pages.It would double the size to have both indexes available (mine is 20 MB already). How do others feel about changing this index to be
msg.value.timestamp
instead?Or maybe doubling the index size isn't so bad?
@clehner @dominictarr @ahdinosaur @mixmix