This implementation automates reporting to verify compliance with GC Cloud Guardrails. SSC and TBS review the results. Cette mise en œuvre automatise la production de rapports afin de vérifier la conformité aux mesures de sécurité infonuagique du GC. SPC et SCT examinent les résultats.
Other
11
stars
5
forks
source link
[BugFix] - Error in the Workbook for guardrails 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 #237
This Pull Request fixes errors related to the workbook for guardrails 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, but not for guardrails 8 and 9. Specifically, it addresses a type mismatch issue in the iff() function where the @then data type (real) did not match the @else data type (string). This PR ensures the correct data type is used for both the @then and @else conditions to avoid the workbook error.
This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes
Fixes #222
Fixes the data type mismatch in the iff() function in the workbook for guardrails 1-7.
Ensures the consistent use of data types across all workbook calculations.
Breaking Changes
None
Testing Evidence
Testing was performed by executing the workbook for all guardrails. Guardrails 1-7 now pass without error, and the correct
values are displayed. Screenshots are provided below:
Overview/Summary
This Pull Request fixes errors related to the workbook for guardrails 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, but not for guardrails 8 and 9. Specifically, it addresses a type mismatch issue in the
iff()function where the@thendata type (real) did not match the@elsedata type (string). This PR ensures the correct data type is used for both the@thenand@elseconditions to avoid the workbook error.This PR fixes/adds/changes/removes
Fixes #222
iff()function in the workbook for guardrails 1-7.Breaking Changes
None
Testing Evidence
Testing was performed by executing the workbook for all guardrails. Guardrails 1-7 now pass without error, and the correct values are displayed. Screenshots are provided below:
As part of this Pull Request I have
mainbranch./tools/Update-ModuleVersions.ps1script)