ssddanbrown / Open-Source-Confusion-Cases

A list of cases where open source licenses are misrepresented or where "Open Source" is used in a non-open-source-definition adhering manner.
MIT License
172 stars 2 forks source link

Databend #25

Open illiliti opened 1 year ago

illiliti commented 1 year ago

Project: https://databend.rs/ License: ELv2, Apache-2.0 Open-source claim: documentation, blog(every page contains "Connect with us" footer which contains open-source claim + some pages have direct open-source claim), description, README, ... Discussion: TODO

ssddanbrown commented 1 year ago

Looks like the value being advertised as open source is within their open source code, but they don't have a specific open source distribution by the looks of things (I'm assuming they are all built with ELv2 code included) which makes me suspicious if the project can be built from open code. Ideally needs a test build.