search

ssddanbrown / Open-Source-Confusion-Cases

A list of cases where open source licenses are misrepresented or where "Open Source" is used in a non-open-source-definition adhering manner.
MIT License
142 stars 1 forks source link

Dokploy #44

Closed ssddanbrown closed 4 months ago

ssddanbrown commented 5 months ago

Project: https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy License is Apache2.0 with strong non-open added terms: https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/blob/be56ba046cb3b2b8676d5f8020cf56844d601730/LICENSE.MD Came across via HN here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40195480#40197567 Raised as a discussion here: https://github.com/Dokploy/dokploy/discussions/3

Project is very young, might just be someone new to open source publishing and not understanding the deeper rights.

ssddanbrown commented 4 months ago

Update: The discussion I raised was closed off and locked without any official response. Appears to have done some marketing though as is now what I'd consider within scope.