codecov[bot]
commented
11 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
1ccaa9f) 91.85% compared to head (522d62c) 97.73%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #24 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 91.85% 97.73% +5.88% ========================================== Files 7 7 Lines 221 221 ========================================== + Hits 203 216 +13 + Misses 18 5 -13 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssec-jhu/dplutils/pull/24/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssec-jhu/dplutils/pull/24/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu) | `97.73% <100.00%> (+5.88%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This updates test for observers where coverate missed due to ray execution. Identified a bug along the way (in param setting in actor wrapped observer)