search

ssec-jhu / dplutils

Distributed(Data, Discovery) Pipeline Uitilities
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
1 stars 0 forks source link

Adding missing executor tests for config #25

Closed amitschang closed 11 months ago

amitschang commented 11 months ago

Also excluding abstract method from coverage to enable achieving 100%

codecov[bot] commented 11 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (7702525) 97.73% compared to head (872a06e) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #25 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 97.73% 100.00% +2.26% =========================================== Files 7 7 Lines 221 218 -3 =========================================== + Hits 216 218 +2 + Misses 5 0 -5 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssec-jhu/dplutils/pull/25/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssec-jhu/dplutils/pull/25/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu) | `100.00% <ø> (+2.26%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.