codecov[bot]
commented
2 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (
8e08dbe) to head (e73f30d).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #90 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 11 11 Lines 577 579 +2 ========================================= + Hits 577 579 +2 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssec-jhu/dplutils/pull/90/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssec-jhu/dplutils/pull/90/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssec-jhu#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Zero length data batches risk starting tasks and serializing data unnecessarily, consuming resources for batches that ultimately would not be expected to yield any data.
Resolves https://github.com/ssec-jhu/dplutils/issues/62