Closed ryanhausen closed 2 months ago
@ryanhausen thanks for doing this. I can take it from here though so that we don't merge this until after some larger existing PRs are merged to reduce significant conflict resolution.
@amitschang FYI
@jamienoss ok, I will cease and desist. Another way is just to merge in (ignoring failures) the config parts of this. But I'll leave it to you
@amitschang Yep, we could merge in the formatted infra without the format changes, turn off the test, and then redo the broad formatting at a later time, but that's almost the same as holding off on this for a mo.
@amitschang I've rebased and rerun the formater. Ready for review again please, cheers.
Also, you cool with this getting merged now? I still have some PRs open that may be a pita to rebase but at least #73 is merged as that would have been very painful.
The formatting is automatable, so should not be too problematic
For sure, we can trivially run it for the new PRs to have them pass the new style test. I meant more about all of the changes introduced by this PR will cause conflicts with existing open PRs when rebasing.
This PR adds the ruff formatter to the project.