Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I'm not sure I understand what the purpose (and safety) would be by doing
that... But, since JavaPNS also accepts InputStream objects for keystores, I
guess one could open a URL connection first, and pass the connection's input
stream to JavaPNS (if the keystore absolutely can't be stored locally).. This
is exactly what the original posting on stackoverflow hinted at by creating an
InputStream from a URL; just pass that InputStream to JavaPNS and it will take
care of the rest.
I do not think that storing the keystore on a secondary server is something we
should be promoting (not being sure about the security implications), thus I
think this enhancement request should be rejected. If the original requester
absolutely needs it, the existing support for InputStreams seems to be a
reasonable solution.
Comments anyone?
PS: I can't understand why people post questions on other web sites while the
project's official web site provides easy ways of posting questions and
requesting support directly from the developers.... weird. Thanks Bill for
reposting the request here :)
Original comment by sype...@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2011 at 10:55
Closing as WontFix, as per reasons stated in previous comment.
Original comment by sype...@gmail.com
on 13 Dec 2011 at 2:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
idbill.p...@gmail.com
on 9 Dec 2011 at 9:54