Open sshivaditya2019 opened 1 month ago
[!NOTE] The following contributors may be suitable for this task:
sshivaditya
69% Match
sshivaditya2019/test-public#139sshivaditya2019
66% Match
sshivaditya2019/test-public#142
@ubosshivaditya I want to work on this issue, is this already fixed ? what do you know about this ?
The issue is currently open and being actively worked on. Initially, there was a setup issue, but it has been identified and is being addressed.
@ubosshivaditya can you tell about the issue ? Where should I begin ?
! Cannot read properties of undefined (reading '0')
@ubosshivaditya can you tell about the issue ? Where should I begin ?
@ubosshivaditya How do I set the repo for this task ? Can you give me the launch commands for this ? and link to the repo for this ticket?
I apologize, but I don't have specific information about setting up a repository or launch commands for this particular task. The issue description doesn't provide those details.
However, based on the context available, this task appears to be related to removing all UbiquiBot references. The relevant repository seems to be:
https://github.com/ubiquity-os-marketplace/daemon-disqualifier
To work on this task, you would likely need to:
Without more specific instructions in the issue, I can't provide exact launch commands. Typically, you'd use standard git commands to clone and work with the repository, and any project-specific setup or run commands would be found in the repository's README or documentation.
If you need more specific guidance, I'd recommend:
Remember to follow any contribution guidelines specified in the repository when submitting your changes.
The issue is currently open and being actively worked on. Initially, there was a setup issue, but it has been identified and is being addressed.
I'm a bit confused about this response I think it is not very clear in the context of the question asked
The issue is currently open and being actively worked on. Initially, there was a setup issue, but it has been identified and is being addressed.
I'm a bit confused about this response I think it is not very clear in the context of the question asked
I think that message is old and intentionally lacks context (testing); I was experimenting with other models for some time.