Open WojciechNagorski opened 11 months ago
I don't know why it was copied, but one possible explanation and downside of using the nuget package: the bouncycastle binary is nearly 7 megabytes.
The size wouldn't be a blocker for me (I would prefer the nuget). I imagine we wouldn't need Chaos.NaCl: I think bouncycastle could be used for Ed25519
I looked through the code coverage and for the most part, the copied code is not covered by tests.
Most of the internal code is unused: #1140
cc @darinkes
@WojciechNagorski, I think you raise an excellent question. If we are counting votes, I would be in favor of using the third-party nuget packages instead of copying the code.
At that time there were no usable NuGets (Chaos.NaCl still hasnt) and BouncyCastle is a huge bloat we just needed a very small part of. Thats why we went the route to import only needed stuff.
I'm ok with switching to NuGet.
I suppose the reasons for including the source code were:
Perhaps the last one was - at that time - the most important reason.
The BouncyCastle code has been removed. I think we can get rid of Chaos.NaCI now.
Does anyone know why SSH.NET uses copies of third-party libraries:
source of information: https://github.com/sshnet/SSH.NET/pull/496#issuecomment-573557849
I wonder if it would be better to use Nuget. We would receive security updates, bug fixes, and optimizations.
I looked through the code coverage and for the most part, the copied code is not covered by tests.
@scott-xu @Rob-Hague @drieseng @jacobslusser