Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 8 years ago
Not before 1.0. We have adequate utility at present; adding support for
javax.xml.namespace.QName raises more questions about other methods (we should
extend the question to: should we just replace namespace + name with QName?).
For initial release ... we don't want the duplication (even of a single method,
as suggested here), and we currently are using the separated style.
Drop priority. Deal with this post-1.0.
Original comment by aale...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2011 at 5:40
I agree that this is a *very* low priority. About the only thing that would
make this essential would be a demonstrated efficiency gain by adding such a
method.
Set milestone to "future".
Original comment by eric%tib...@gtempaccount.com
on 15 Feb 2011 at 8:56
Suggestion has been made that we bump the priority on this.
Original comment by aale...@gmail.com
on 26 Jul 2012 at 7:18
At this point, I'd be in favor of universally changing the interface, such that
we always use QName. It's pretty much expected; apart from DOM, we're probably
one of the very few APIs around that return namespace and local name and prefix
separately.
Original comment by aale...@gmail.com
on 3 Apr 2014 at 5:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
aale...@gmail.com
on 5 Nov 2010 at 6:16