Open cl0ne opened 1 year ago
It's possible, but it could very easily become a bug factory without a clear benefit. The current matrix
method is write-only, and suggests that you use transform
unless you particularly need to pass a low-level matrix.
Do you have a use case for reading the matrix that can't be accomplished by the existing transformation methods?
Hi! Currently, I can't remember why I was looking into this part of the code. Probably I was debugging my own code. But I spotted the inconsistency in the behavior and an unused field, so I decided to ask if this as intended and what is the intent.
Greetings!
Private matrix field is never used (neither written to nor read from) https://github.com/ssimms/pdfapi2/blob/0f602e0eec825f54deacb1ecff1d6d9c5e4f8031/lib/PDF/API2/Content.pm#L52 and in
matrix
property we return$self
for graphics objects: https://github.com/ssimms/pdfapi2/blob/0f602e0eec825f54deacb1ecff1d6d9c5e4f8031/lib/PDF/API2/Content.pm#L316-L336 Shouldn't we store changes to the graphics state matrix in the aforementioned private field and return it frommatrix
accessor?