codecov[bot]
commented
1 week ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 83.09%. Comparing base (
f360c6a) to head (36e3076).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #522 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 83.09% 83.09% ======================================= Files 27 27 Lines 1674 1674 ======================================= Hits 1391 1391 Misses 283 283 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssl-hep/ServiceX_frontend/pull/522/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssl-hep) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ssl-hep/ServiceX_frontend/pull/522/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssl-hep) | `83.09% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ssl-hep#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I don't see a reason why user needs to see source code of documentation readthedoc pages. It's a bit annoying place by default, so I would like to remove it 😄
Current
New