Open jackhagley opened 2 years ago
Hey @jackhagley, I thought the single-line :::
& multiline ??
separators achieve this? š¤
Those are the reversed ones? The ???
I propose gives a 50/50 chance whether to reverse the card or not.
So:
Question ??? Answer
Half of the time it would start with the question, and half of the time with the answer
First, thanks for this great plugin! š
I was wondering the same thing though. The only solution I came up with is to duplicate the cards
Q :: A
Q ::: A
But of course, the tracking is a bit messed up...
Would be great to introduce a new symbol for "two-way" cards!
Hey @jackhagley, I thought the single-line
:::
& multiline??
separators achieve this? š¤
I do this 50/50 a lot manually. It would really help me if I could have it multiline reverse. Or at the very least, if its a feature you are willing to accept, i can just code it.
Hi
I've put together: Summary of suggestions regarding flashcard ordering whilst reviewing
I think that this can be solved using the combination of:
:::
& multiline ??
separators as described by @st3v3nmw With that combination, there is a 50/50 chance that side A would be shown first, and 50/50 for side B. Note that these would be interspersed with the other cards within that deck.
Does that suit your requirements, or would there still be some functionality missing?
Cheers Ronny
@ronzulu Iām not sure this supplies the granularity that a new operator can supply.
I have to list cards twice if I want them to come up as reversed and not. This does not seem an efficient use of space or cards. It would be better if there was a way to denote that the card could come up either way.
Introduce the ??? operator to have a card randomly be pulled as Up or Down