Closed PanierAvide closed 2 years ago
Hi @PanierAvide
Thank you for raising this issue!
"Field of view" seems like a good candidate for inclusion in this extension. I guess there are cases where an estimated field of view is the best available information about the camera. Also - together with the perspective_centre
and view:azimuth
the field of view would give a pretty good idea of the scene. So your PR is very welcome.
I am a little curious about how well 360° would fit with this extension. Could you share how you plan to describe your data?
Best regards Asger
Hi, thanks for your feedback. I will work on the pull request soon.
We already have a working API to offer 360° pictures metadata, here's an example collection and here an example of a single picture. As I'm quite new to the world of STAC schemes, you may have some suggestions about improvements on it was implemented.
Best regards.
@PanierAvide The STAC community seems to be most active on gitter, I would recommend also asking for feedback in https://gitter.im/SpatioTemporal-Asset-Catalog/Lobby.
@PanierAvide I am sorry. I have been busy lately. The links seem to be broken now.
Sorry for that, here is a more stable URL for collections : https://geovisio.fr/api/collections/ And for individual pictures : https://geovisio.fr/api/search
Thank you. The field_of_view
is a very welcome contribution to this spec.
I am no expert in 360 degree images, so I dont know if it is defined as perspective imagery. But it seems to make sense in your use case.
Hello,
As we're making use of STAC and its extension in a project to allow hosting of street imagery, we would find interesting to have a property allowing to describe the camera field of view. This would allow us to make a standardized distinction between 360° pictures and classic pictures (useful for a web viewer to have a proper rendering).
If this proposal makes sense to you, I can offer a PR to add this in the extension.
Best regards.