Open rhysrevans3 opened 10 months ago
@rhysrevans3 This pr looks really good. We have just been in the middle of adding opensearch support. Do you have any experience with opensearch?
@jonhealy1 I've added some more tests but realised the current version of stac-pydantic the api is using doesn't allow a null
datetime field. To update to the latest version of stac-pydantic will require changes to both stac-fastapi and stac-fastapi-elasticsearch. I've made the changes to stac-fastapi in this pull request and am working on the changes to elasticsearch. But I think this pull request will have to wait until they're merged.
@rhysrevans3 This pr looks really good. We have just been in the middle of adding opensearch support. Do you have any experience with opensearch?
I don't have any experience with Opensearch but am happy merge main's changes into this branch and try to add this functionality to the opensearch parts.
@rhysrevans3 Any new thoughts? Hopefully we can merge this soon.
@jonhealy1 update on this pull request:
Hi @rhysrevans3, the pydantic v2 is merged now into main via stac-pydantic if you want to have another look at this. Cheers.
@jonhealy1 it looks like that stac-pydantic still won't allow a null datetime I thought the validator would allow this but I think the typing stops it. https://github.com/stac-utils/stac-pydantic/blob/main/stac_pydantic/item.py#L31-L58
Good news is there appears to be 3 pull requests that will fix this: https://github.com/stac-utils/stac-pydantic/pull/116 https://github.com/stac-utils/stac-pydantic/pull/131 https://github.com/stac-utils/stac-pydantic/pull/135
Sorry for the delay in this.
Hi @rhysrevans3 - no problems whatsoever - thanks for staying on top of this!
@jonhealy1 looks like this might be finally ready to merge. :)
Related Issue(s):
181
Description: Extending temporal search include start_datetime and end_datetime properties
PR Checklist:
pre-commit run --all-files
)make test
)