Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
From here it looks like the footprint is being forced to 4326 (called in line 234 of the same dir).
Describe the solution you'd like
If the CRS is being passed in, could we allow RasterFootprint to use the CRS for the reproject. The default should be "EPSG:4326" because the GeoJSON spec (unfortunately) assumed 4326.
Describe alternatives you've considered
As an alternative to this, one could (I think?) take the output file and reproject is using something like ogr2ogr.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. From here it looks like the footprint is being forced to 4326 (called in line 234 of the same dir).
Describe the solution you'd like If the CRS is being passed in, could we allow RasterFootprint to use the CRS for the reproject. The default should be "EPSG:4326" because the GeoJSON spec (unfortunately) assumed 4326.
Describe alternatives you've considered As an alternative to this, one could (I think?) take the output file and reproject is using something like
ogr2ogr.Additional context None noted.