Closed GinaAbrams closed 5 years ago
My question: Where does this live? – Docs – Repo – Linked to or visible on each results page
Ideally, miners have an "administer" my app page in app.co. That page should allow them to change information related to the app and see information related to their app. For example, a graph over time showing how their ranking changed would be very useful both as information and motivation.
Then, from that they could drill to the results from a particular iteration of app mining. All of the data about a particular iteration should live in a DB. That way, we can build different insights that we can deliver to the participants.
Which is to say --- both the docs and repo are very static solutions. A nascent solution should be data on the app.co side. That at least would keep the maintenance pain where it can remind everyone about the better functionality to come. 🦊
I hope my app meta data is owned by me and lives in my storage, not in app.co! I would like to manage my data on https://app-center.openintents.org :-P
We're adding this to the app mining docs now. https://paper.dropbox.com/doc/App-Miner-Key--AgL00XQwDrslEPwH~rMnXYq~Ag-45LjBprYjAguRExuj8F3S
This has been added to docs. link. The changes here are in the section How apps are reviewed and ranked
@jeffdomke looks like we didn't assign you here but I think the next step was you were going to check the new docs out -- sections are how apps are reviewed and scored, and how scores become rankings.
Thanks just seeing this now will put on my to-do list.
This is great. Couple small suggestions:
Founders can take this brief survey to fill out their preferred audiences
There is no link here.
and the OS that matches the app if it is mobile
Find this phrase confusing.
Application Miner’s Guide to Promoting your App.
Application Miners
seems like an odd phrasing.
@GinaAbrams if you like @jeffdomke 's suggestions, let me know here, I'll implement them.
thanks @moxiegirl , let's please go ahead and make the changes. For the link to the preferred audiences, let's please use this link. Thank you! 🙏
hey @moxiegirl can we prioritize for this week? :pray:
@GinaAbrams I'll take care of this today.
Fixed with this: https://github.com/blockstack/docs.blockstack/pull/338
Woot! Thank you 🙏
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 5:32 PM Moxiegirl notifications@github.com wrote:
Fixed with this: blockstack/docs.blockstack#338 https://github.com/blockstack/docs.blockstack/pull/338
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/blockstack/app-mining/issues/102?email_source=notifications&email_token=AHJVN76BPMRL5NTQJIU4QNLQDM5OXA5CNFSM4HKVDDQ2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD3ZYTOI#issuecomment-519276985, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHJVN74MNOYFUB2AEYVX6W3QDM5OXANCNFSM4HKVDDQQ .
-- Gina Abrams, Growth Partner Blockstack http://blockstack.org/
What is the problem you are seeing? Please describe. The way the results are shared with app miners is not super readable at the moment, or easy to understand.
How is this problem misaligned with goals of app mining? App miners should be able to quickly understand what the results mean and where they stand in comparison to others on each vector of review.
What is the explicit recommendation you’re looking to propose? Create a reference "key" for the results page.
Describe your long term considerations in proposing this change. Please include the ways you can predict this recommendation could go wrong and possible ways mitigate. In the future, this could be a dedicated web page for viewing results, with filters to toggle results by different factors. It could get really interesting, but also complex and time consuming. A simple key can help to start.