Closed friedger closed 4 years ago
What is the problem you are seeing? Please describe. Some teams stop developing, promoting, maintaining their apps.
How is this problem misaligned with goals of app mining? It is unfair to other teams that do improve their apps.
What is the explicit recommendation you’re looking to propose? Add a reviewer that provides proof of activity for each team publicly, e.g. marketing activity, development activity, design activity.
The reviewer gives a score of 1 if the team is active otherwise -1. If the reviewer can't get any information from the team, then the reviewer will mark the app as ineligible.
Describe your long term considerations in proposing this change. Please include the ways you can predict this recommendation could go wrong and possible ways mitigate. This can be automated process that is supervised by a DAO in the future
Additional context
64
My Equipool miner is not working correctly. How do I get it to work? It mines and the miner shows speed as 21 sols/s, BUT when I go to the Equipool data site it shows Speed 0, and Avg speed 0. Why is this app not working? Red letters on my miner say "INFO: GPU0 Rejected share 50ms [A: 0, R:1 (or R:2 or R:3 etc)]. I got screenshots.
This is a cool idea. PBC can't do this so would need an external party we trust. Who would do this. I also think we would not want to remove apps at this time, but we would like to reward those who improve their app vs. those who make not progress.
What would be the requirements? OpenIntents could provide such reviews.
A score for different activity levels could be possible as well.
Continued in #138
What is the problem you are seeing? Please describe. Some teams stop developing, promoting, maintaining their apps.
How is this problem misaligned with goals of app mining? It is unfair to other teams that do improve their apps.
What is the explicit recommendation you’re looking to propose? Add a reviewer that provides proof of activity for each team publicly, e.g. marketing activity, development activity, design activity.
The reviewer gives a score of 1 if the team is active otherwise -1. If the reviewer can't get any information from the team, then the reviewer will mark the app as ineligible.
Describe your long term considerations in proposing this change. Please include the ways you can predict this recommendation could go wrong and possible ways mitigate. This can be automated process that is supervised by a DAO in the future
Additional context
64