What is the problem you are seeing? Please describe.
The model of evaluation of the development of dApps benefit only certain type of endeavours
How is this problem misaligned with goals of app mining?
There is a need to have a diversity of dApps specially the ones that take advantage of the Blockstack solution
What is the explicit recommendation you’re looking to propose?
Analyze the attached algorithm and see ways to modify the bias scoring
Describe your long term considerations in proposing this change. Please include the ways you can predict this recommendation could go wrong and possible ways mitigate.
There must be an analysis of the specific dApps presented compared to the Applications categories or type of apps existent in the world, detect advantages, improvements, etc.
Digital marketing in some of the cases is not easy done as it is going to be discovered with the market interaction. Specially in innovative cases or new categories of dApps that did not exist before. Example: Mobile phones with data access were introduced in the market when there was not a category for that service
Additional context (sorry for the pseucode language and there is no identation here)
Browsing some of the dApps, and the results of the evaluation of AppMining, looks like that today the successful algorithm is the following:
Nowadays, can you identify a proven worldwide massively used application?
{
If found()==true then
{
Is the type of app or category of solution well known or understood by many users?
{
if well_understood() == true then
{
Is simple to build?
if simpletobuild()==true then
{
Are there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it?
if any_advantages()==true then
Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users.
else (no advantages)
Better not to build --> But looks like that many dApps have gone this way
}
else (not so simple to build)
{
Is there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it more simple?
if any_advantages()==true then
Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users.
else (no advantages)
Better not to build --> Some dapps have stopped development, probably because of the difficulties.
}
}
}
else (the category is not massively understood or a it is a new category)
Depending of the market size of user, the bigger the better
{
if simpletobuild()==true then
{
Is there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it?
if any_advantages()==true then
Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users.
The Digital Marketing will be more difficult as the category is not so massively known and there will be a search to find the proper way to explain what is being developed and shift direction of development to match that explanation
The problem here is that most of the dAPPS that they category are better known and simpler to build are going to get better scoring that this dAPP, so the probability to be among the first ones is nearly impossible. Similar as issue #212 "Custom framing for TryMyUI reviews"
else (no advantages)
Better not to build
}
else (not so simple to build)
}
Are there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it more simple?
if any_advantages()==true then
Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users.
The Digital Marketing will be more difficult as the category is not so massively known and there will be a search to find the proper way to explain what is being developed and shift direction of development to match that explanation
The problem here is that most of the dAPPS that they category are better known and simpler to build are going to get better scoring that this dAPP, so the probability to be among the first ones is nearly impossible. Similar as issue #212 "Custom framing for TryMyUI reviews"
else (no advantages)
Better not to build --> Some dapps have stopped development, probably because of the difficulties.
}
End of category that is not massively understood
}
else (no app category massively used)
{
Are there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it more simple?
if any_advantages()==true then
Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users.
The Digital Marketing will be more difficult as the category is not so massively known and there will be a search to find the proper way to explain what is being developed and shift direction of development to match that explanation
The problem here is that most of the dAPPS that they category are better known and simpler to build are going to get better scoring that this dAPP, so the probability to be among the first ones is nearly impossible. Similar as issue #212 "Custom framing for TryMyUI reviews"
else (no advantages)
Better not to build --> Some dapps have stopped development, probably because of the difficulties.
}
}
What is the problem you are seeing? Please describe. The model of evaluation of the development of dApps benefit only certain type of endeavours
How is this problem misaligned with goals of app mining? There is a need to have a diversity of dApps specially the ones that take advantage of the Blockstack solution
What is the explicit recommendation you’re looking to propose? Analyze the attached algorithm and see ways to modify the bias scoring
Describe your long term considerations in proposing this change. Please include the ways you can predict this recommendation could go wrong and possible ways mitigate. There must be an analysis of the specific dApps presented compared to the Applications categories or type of apps existent in the world, detect advantages, improvements, etc. Digital marketing in some of the cases is not easy done as it is going to be discovered with the market interaction. Specially in innovative cases or new categories of dApps that did not exist before. Example: Mobile phones with data access were introduced in the market when there was not a category for that service
Additional context (sorry for the pseucode language and there is no identation here) Browsing some of the dApps, and the results of the evaluation of AppMining, looks like that today the successful algorithm is the following:
Nowadays, can you identify a proven worldwide massively used application? { If found()==true then { Is the type of app or category of solution well known or understood by many users? { if well_understood() == true then { Is simple to build? if simpletobuild()==true then { Are there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it? if any_advantages()==true then Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users. else (no advantages) Better not to build --> But looks like that many dApps have gone this way } else (not so simple to build) { Is there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it more simple? if any_advantages()==true then Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users. else (no advantages) Better not to build --> Some dapps have stopped development, probably because of the difficulties. } } } else (the category is not massively understood or a it is a new category) Depending of the market size of user, the bigger the better { if simpletobuild()==true then { Is there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it? if any_advantages()==true then Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users. The Digital Marketing will be more difficult as the category is not so massively known and there will be a search to find the proper way to explain what is being developed and shift direction of development to match that explanation The problem here is that most of the dAPPS that they category are better known and simpler to build are going to get better scoring that this dAPP, so the probability to be among the first ones is nearly impossible. Similar as issue #212 "Custom framing for TryMyUI reviews" else (no advantages) Better not to build } else (not so simple to build) } Are there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it more simple? if any_advantages()==true then Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users. The Digital Marketing will be more difficult as the category is not so massively known and there will be a search to find the proper way to explain what is being developed and shift direction of development to match that explanation The problem here is that most of the dAPPS that they category are better known and simpler to build are going to get better scoring that this dAPP, so the probability to be among the first ones is nearly impossible. Similar as issue #212 "Custom framing for TryMyUI reviews" else (no advantages) Better not to build --> Some dapps have stopped development, probably because of the difficulties. } End of category that is not massively understood
} else (no app category massively used) { Are there any advantages of using Blockstack technology to rebuild it more simple? if any_advantages()==true then Build the dAPP ---> Probably if there are technical capabilities to build it, the digital marketing will be clearer to address and the evaluation of the UI of the possible users. The Digital Marketing will be more difficult as the category is not so massively known and there will be a search to find the proper way to explain what is being developed and shift direction of development to match that explanation The problem here is that most of the dAPPS that they category are better known and simpler to build are going to get better scoring that this dAPP, so the probability to be among the first ones is nearly impossible. Similar as issue #212 "Custom framing for TryMyUI reviews" else (no advantages) Better not to build --> Some dapps have stopped development, probably because of the difficulties. } }