Closed friedger closed 5 years ago
@friedger
@jeffdomke The scenario is copied from the current tests. So this PR would reflect the current status (that I know about). From here we can make suggestions and get a nice diff.
I think it makes sense to include the current instruction set (as Friedger has done). I might suggest more explanation about who TMUI is and why they're a reviewer.
There is more information about TMUI on the other page on docs.blockstack.org about app mining.
On Mon, 25 Feb 2019, 20:01 Hank Stoever, notifications@github.com wrote:
I think it makes sense to include the current instruction set (as Friedger has done). I might suggest more explanation about who TMUI is and why they're a reviewer.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/blockstack/app-mining/pull/47#issuecomment-467137276, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABYcWcRMaX1KM-G_u8iawDhqskbjqCHCks5vRDMfgaJpZM4bPhJt .
This PR