Closed kusai90 closed 1 year ago
Hi @kusai90. Do you plan on helping with the benchmarking? If so that's great, thanks! Checkout the later version of that table, replicated below. Let me know if you have any questions.
Version | Commit | Num Tx | %-Full | Fees Collected (uSTX) | Time Spent (ms) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
master | 378fc1b80e161ce1b82cc98b3802565222100816 | 105 | 4.97% | 25175605 | 33983.1 |
#3326 | faffe420d8c5dee8151a988d0f8bc1b7ebb227de | 1034 | 99.97% | 144993355 | 16604.9 |
#3337 | 1586e86d20d8931c3e51804e337539f3b3c1d33a | 1097 | 100% | 189810290 | 15624.7 |
Treating as spam.
I was previously seeing better numbers for the other implementation, so it might be good for someone else to try benchmarking these and see if it is reproducible.
The better numbers from before were when the caching was applied on top of the changes in #3326.
Originally posted by @obycode in https://github.com/stacks-network/stacks-blockchain/issues/3337#issuecomment-1276064427