Closed gadomski closed 2 years ago
For NASA's CMR STAC collections are named using "SHORT_NAME_VERSION", which I think in general is a good way to name collections....having a version number in the ID is critical (if there's ever going to be reprocessing). See https://cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov/stac/LPDAAC_ECS/collections/MCD43A4.v006
I agree that slashes is no good in an ID - some API implementations may even break. I think your suggestion is good, although my preference would be like "MCD12Q1-061"....and then put all the collections in a "MODIS" catalog rather than including "modis" in the ID.
my preference would be like "MCD12Q1-061"
Ok, yeah I think I like having the product before version as well.
and then put all the collections in a "MODIS" catalog rather than including "modis" in the ID
Hm, interesting. From the spec:
And providers should strive as much as possible to make their Collection ids 'globally' unique, prefixing any common information with a unique string. This could be the provider's name if it is a fairly unique name, or their name combined with the domain they operate in.
It seems like if we were creating a "globally" unique ID, we should include the string "MODIS" (or "modis") in the Collection
id?
Yeah, I can see wanting that to be "globally" unique....so "modis-MCD43AA4-006 or something. Or MODIS could be capital...I think in STAC best practices it to favor lowercase and dashes in IDs, unless the provider already has an established naming convention (which is why you see "LANDSAT_8" as a platform name in the USGS API)
Right now the ID format is
MODIS/{version}/{product}
, e.g.MODIS/006/MCD12Q1
. This isn't illegal, but it's not quite "standard" -- it seems like most STACCollection
s use hypens and lower-case. So, we should update IDs to bemodis-{version}-{product}
.While we're doing the update, do we want to make the product come before version? E.g.
modis-{product}-{version}
, e.g.modis-MCD12Q1-006
?