Kristinn-Stefansson
commented
1 year ago Meeting of TN-FMÞ-VH7-15 determined that there had been an explicit design desicion to have this ID openended and not interoperable or comparable between banks. The claimTemplateId would therefore remain as it is defined currently.
The description for claimTemplateId is "Unique template id defined by the banks."
Could claimTemplateId follow a similar similar format as claimdId rather than being left ambiguous and up to the implementation of each bank?
For example: bankNumber + claimantId + templateCode. pattern: [0-9A-Z]{17}