Open hbruch opened 3 years ago
RE4 seems the correct thing to display and not sure if T04 is useful for anyone.
Are NVBW likely to make a change or does this call for another processing step in gtfs-hub?
I'll check with NVBW next week. Interestingly, DB calls the same train RE 87, so there seem to be some more issues than just wrong route_short_name
When searching for e.g. https://dev.stadtnavi.eu/reiseplan/Stuttgart%20Hauptbahnhof%2C%20Baustra%C3%9Fe%20Stuttgart%2021%2C%2070173%20Stuttgart%3A%3A48.7856099%2C9.1833959/Bahnhof%20Herrenberg%2C%2071083%20Herrenberg%3A%3A48.59399520051186%2C8.862125873565676/?time=1620795624
the long distance train (retrieved from DELFI eV GTFS) is labeled as T04 RE4:
The DB connections show the same train with different train numbers:
The underlying GTFS data lists this route as
00,90-T04-j21-1,T04,RE4,2,,,-999
so the frontend is rendering as it should. Looks like a data issue to be discussed with NVBW, as it stems from the SPNV-BW feed.