Closed mitzimorris closed 6 months ago
I think we can get rid of it. The doc doesn't even say what it does, only that it's been replaced by stansummary
.
https://mc-stan.org/docs/cmdstan-guide/print-deprecated-mcmc-output-analysis.html
See discussion in #1251
Summary:
The
print
utility is advertised as deprecated. why bother to compile it by default?Description:
Makefile advertises that print will be removed: https://github.com/stan-dev/cmdstan/blob/3284433f25bd589f2cfc6dbc6abec3b8e09be3a3/makefile#L171
question of semantics - if we leave the source file avilable but don't compile it, does this count?
compiled here: https://github.com/stan-dev/cmdstan/blob/3284433f25bd589f2cfc6dbc6abec3b8e09be3a3/makefile#L266
Is it worth skipping the compile step of one utility program? I'm doing an initial install of CmdStan on a linux HPC cluster, running cmdstanr's
install_cmdstan()
function and it is slow.print
utility is a very small part of that.Current Version:
v2.34.1